<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rules of Soaps &#8211; Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/19/rules-of-soaps-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/19/rules-of-soaps-part-1/</link>
	<description>drive fast; die rich</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:58:10 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dea_ex_machina</title>
		<link>http://blog.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/19/rules-of-soaps-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-15984</link>
		<dc:creator>dea_ex_machina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/19/rules-of-soaps-part-1/#comment-15984</guid>
		<description>The soap weather rule
(This applies mainly in aussie soaps)
The weather will always be glorious, unless:
a) someone has just run away from home and has to sleep rough
or 
b) someone is about to give birth and is on their way to hospital.
In both cases, there will be an unprecedented thunder storm, rivers will break their banks, and roads will be flooded. 
It strikes me that one way of avoiding drought in certain parts of Australia would be to throw all teenagers out of the house, or refrain from telling pregnant mothers when they are due! - The ensuing floods would provide enough water to turn all of Australia into a lush green oasis!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The soap weather rule<br />
(This applies mainly in aussie soaps)<br />
The weather will always be glorious, unless:<br />
a) someone has just run away from home and has to sleep rough<br />
or<br />
b) someone is about to give birth and is on their way to hospital.<br />
In both cases, there will be an unprecedented thunder storm, rivers will break their banks, and roads will be flooded.<br />
It strikes me that one way of avoiding drought in certain parts of Australia would be to throw all teenagers out of the house, or refrain from telling pregnant mothers when they are due! &#8211; The ensuing floods would provide enough water to turn all of Australia into a lush green oasis!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: an actual duck</title>
		<link>http://blog.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/19/rules-of-soaps-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>an actual duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/19/rules-of-soaps-part-1/#comment-525</guid>
		<description>hey pete/others

can we have a random look-a-like section of the blog? (apologies if there already is one, i havent looked around much)
preferably based around people we know? its essetially the chance to take the piss from a safe distance for others amusement...

i&#039;d like to mention that dotty looks alot like Katya from neighbours (check out the character list on the neighbours page fans!) 

plus i&#039;d personally love it if everyone who did mention a look-a-like could end their post with the following;

&quot;you know i&#039;ve never seen them in the same room together...&quot;
however unlikely it is that you and they would be in the same room together! (also, if you did find yourself in the same room with your subjects would you bring it to their attention or would you just sit back and wait for that weird look of recognition to appear on their faces....????? its one of lifes &#039;big&#039; questions.

so yeah dotty and katya!

&quot;you know i&#039;ve never seen them in the same room together...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey pete/others</p>
<p>can we have a random look-a-like section of the blog? (apologies if there already is one, i havent looked around much)<br />
preferably based around people we know? its essetially the chance to take the piss from a safe distance for others amusement&#8230;</p>
<p>i&#8217;d like to mention that dotty looks alot like Katya from neighbours (check out the character list on the neighbours page fans!) </p>
<p>plus i&#8217;d personally love it if everyone who did mention a look-a-like could end their post with the following;</p>
<p>&#8220;you know i&#8217;ve never seen them in the same room together&#8230;&#8221;<br />
however unlikely it is that you and they would be in the same room together! (also, if you did find yourself in the same room with your subjects would you bring it to their attention or would you just sit back and wait for that weird look of recognition to appear on their faces&#8230;.????? its one of lifes &#8216;big&#8217; questions.</p>
<p>so yeah dotty and katya!</p>
<p>&#8220;you know i&#8217;ve never seen them in the same room together&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peteamania &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rules of soaps – Part 3</title>
		<link>http://blog.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/19/rules-of-soaps-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>Peteamania &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rules of soaps – Part 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 15:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/19/rules-of-soaps-part-1/#comment-323</guid>
		<description>[...] I’d like to congratulate all the readers who have contributed their own rules of soaps so far, let’s have any other ones you have added to this post. Here are links to Rule of Soaps Part 1 and Part 2 encase you missed them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I’d like to congratulate all the readers who have contributed their own rules of soaps so far, let’s have any other ones you have added to this post. Here are links to Rule of Soaps Part 1 and Part 2 encase you missed them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peteamania &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rules of Soaps – Part 2</title>
		<link>http://blog.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/19/rules-of-soaps-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Peteamania &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rules of Soaps – Part 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/19/rules-of-soaps-part-1/#comment-299</guid>
		<description>[...] After the run away success of Rules of Soaps Part 1 here is the much anticipated sequel! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] After the run away success of Rules of Soaps Part 1 here is the much anticipated sequel! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phevans</title>
		<link>http://blog.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/19/rules-of-soaps-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Phevans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/19/rules-of-soaps-part-1/#comment-285</guid>
		<description>People who aren&#039;t important in the scope of the soap are mysteriously unable to speak. Perhaps the soap focuses on the main characters because they are the only ones with the power of communication in a world of mutes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who aren&#8217;t important in the scope of the soap are mysteriously unable to speak. Perhaps the soap focuses on the main characters because they are the only ones with the power of communication in a world of mutes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grzeg</title>
		<link>http://blog.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/19/rules-of-soaps-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Grzeg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/19/rules-of-soaps-part-1/#comment-284</guid>
		<description>I love the fact that the big KK can run a GP surgery, appears to the only doctor in the entire Hospital and yet still has plenty of time to have a hilarious obsession with making it in the music industry. It must be the longest running mid-life crisis in soap history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the fact that the big KK can run a GP surgery, appears to the only doctor in the entire Hospital and yet still has plenty of time to have a hilarious obsession with making it in the music industry. It must be the longest running mid-life crisis in soap history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Nene</title>
		<link>http://blog.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/19/rules-of-soaps-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Nene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/19/rules-of-soaps-part-1/#comment-282</guid>
		<description>Doctor Rule.
There is only one doctor that can perform every medical procedure in the world. The only exception to this rule is the soap: &quot;Doctors&quot;

Everyone else is mad rule.
There will always be one person who knows they are right, but no-one else will believe them until it is too late. This will cause the person to go crazy trying to prove they are right, and ultimately end up in ruins. eg Max from neighbours, OB from Oaks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doctor Rule.<br />
There is only one doctor that can perform every medical procedure in the world. The only exception to this rule is the soap: &#8220;Doctors&#8221;</p>
<p>Everyone else is mad rule.<br />
There will always be one person who knows they are right, but no-one else will believe them until it is too late. This will cause the person to go crazy trying to prove they are right, and ultimately end up in ruins. eg Max from neighbours, OB from Oaks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

